Are Musk’s Actions Leaving U.S. Federal Systems Open to Cyber Threats?

February 5, 2025

The recent actions taken by Elon Musk and his team from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), particularly after the Trump administration’s dismantling of certain federal agencies, have ignited significant concerns among cybersecurity experts and government watchdogs. This development has primarily been alarming due to the alleged mishandling and potential breaches of sensitive federal systems and data. The circumstances around these controversial actions are putting millions of federal employees’ personal information at risk and potentially contravening federal laws that govern the management of classified and sensitive information.

Unauthorized Access to Treasury Payment Systems

The main fears arise from the Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to access the payment system managed by the Department of the Treasury, which is crucial for the administration of government expenditures such as Social Security and Medicare. This activity, which began on January 20, has led experts to argue that these actions signify severe security lapses, potentially jeopardizing the personal data of millions of federal employees and breaching federal laws concerning the handling of classified and sensitive information.

Further complicating the situation are incidents where Musk reportedly installed an unauthorized private server within the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). This action presents substantial cybersecurity concerns, as the OPM’s system contains sensitive records for millions of current and former federal employees. The ongoing reference to the 2015 OPM data breach by Chinese hackers, widely considered one of the worst federal security breaches, reinforces the severe repercussions that could stem from such actions. This comparison often recalls the contentious debate surrounding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server, which garnered immense scrutiny during the 2016 elections.

White House Assurances and Contradictions

The White House had stated that DOGE employees’ access to critical federal systems was restricted to “read-only” capabilities. However, many reports contradict this assurance, indicating that a young former employee of Musk was granted administrative access to these systems, heightening alarm within the security community. This discrepancy between what was communicated by the White House and what occurred in reality has drawn the attention of major political figures, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Senator Warren has pressed Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessant for answers regarding what she terms a “security and management failure.” This inquiry underscores the public’s reliance on the integrity of these systems for essential services, including Social Security checks, tax refunds, and federal salaries. A diverse array of perspectives from cybersecurity and good government experts reflects a unanimous consensus that these actions breach both the spirit and the letter of the law concerning federal cybersecurity statutes, notably the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA).

Potential Risks and Legal Implications

The implications of the unauthorized access to federal systems under DOGE’s control are multi-faceted. First, there is a real risk that DOGE employees could misappropriate protected federal data, making the systems vulnerable to potential cyber-attacks. Second, the lack of proper oversight exacerbates accountability issues concerning what specific data was accessed or possibly modified during this window of unauthorized control. This concern is particularly pressing when considering the OPM’s extensive connections, including with the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency.

Lawmakers, such as Representatives Gerry Connolly and Shontel Brown, have conveyed heightened concerns in their communications with OPM acting director Charles Ezell. They emphasize the potential exposure of federal workers to sophisticated phishing tactics and other cyber threats, likening the administration’s actions to a troubling mix of negligence, incompetence, and willful disruption. The potential for adversarial nations, such as China and Russia, to exploit these weaknesses further underscores the gravity of the situation.

Federal Employees’ Dilemma and Legal Repercussions

Given the complexity and sensitivity of the situation, federal employees find themselves in a precarious dilemma. Trump’s executive order had not extended access to classified federal systems, paradoxically compelling employees to risk breaches of the E-Government Act of 2002 if they were to comply unwillingly. Attorney Bradley Moss has underscored the importance of obtaining specific written authorization before granting such access, noting the severe repercussions for employees who strive to uphold established protocols. Some employees are already facing administrative leave or termination as a consequence of these risks.

The handling of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) also comes with explicitly defined legal protections and stringent standards for access, even for this lower-tier data category. This broader cybersecurity landscape highlights expert Robert Metzger’s emphasis on established procedures to underscore trustworthiness in accessing even non-classified but sensitive data. The broader implications for an administrative state navigating lax security practices are dire.

Systemic Risks and Broader Implications

Recent actions by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) team, particularly following the Trump administration’s dismantling of certain federal agencies, have sparked grave concerns among cybersecurity experts and government accountability groups. These experts are especially worried about the potential mishandling and breaches of critical federal systems and data. This situation has escalated fears about the safety and integrity of millions of federal employees’ personal information. The actions taken by Musk’s team are seen as potentially violating federal regulations governing the protection and management of classified and sensitive information. The controversial moves have led to increasing scrutiny and apprehension about the overall impact on national security measures. Additionally, there are growing questions about the long-term implications for the transparency and functionality of federal agencies. The fallout from these actions may lead to further debates on how government data should be safeguarded in the future.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later